The Execution Consistency Score is the mathematical result of our proprietary Management Credibility Audit. We quantify the alignment between historical management guidance and audited financial outcomes.

30% of Total Q-Score
Execution Consistency = (Delivered ÷ Promised) × Accountability Modifier
Where Accountability Modifier rewards honest miss explanations and penalises excuse-making

The SMART Guidance Filter

We only track commitments that meet SMART criteria. Generic phrases like "We aim to grow" are discarded as noise—they cannot be verified and therefore cannot build or destroy credibility.

S
Specific
M
Measurable
A
Achievable
R
Relevant
T
Time-bound

The Audit Mechanism

The Guidance Filter

We extract only SMART commitments from management communications. Vague aspirations don't make the cut—we need targets we can verify against audited outcomes.

Passes Filter
"We target AISC below $1,200/oz for FY25"
Fails Filter
"We aim to deliver industry-leading cost performance"

The Delivery Audit

We verify outcomes using 3rd-party audited reports only. No management-prepared materials, no press releases—only the numbers the auditors signed off on.

Audit Example
Promise: "AISC below $1,200/oz" → Delivered: $1,400/oz → Penalty Applied

The Honesty Bonus

We reward "Honest Accountability." Management teams that explain why a target was missed with data-driven transparency score higher than those who deploy macro-economic excuses or quietly hope investors don't notice.

Earns Honesty Bonus
"We missed our margin target due to a specific supplier contract renegotiation. Here's the impact: $X. Here's our remediation timeline: Q2 FY26."
No Bonus / Penalty
"Challenging macro conditions impacted our performance" (with no specifics)

Scoring Impact Examples

Scenario Outcome Score Impact
Target met or exceeded Delivered as promised +5 to +8 points
Target missed with honest explanation Miss acknowledged transparently −2 to −4 points
Target missed with excuse Blamed on external factors −5 to −8 points
Target quietly dropped No longer mentioned in reports −8 to −12 points
KPI changed to hide miss New metric introduced mid-cycle −10 to −15 points

The Key Insight: We don't penalise misses—markets are unpredictable. We penalise how management responds to misses. Honest teams build credibility even when they underperform. Excuse-makers destroy it.

Why This Matters for Investors

When management provides forward guidance, how much should you believe them? The Execution Consistency Score gives you a data-driven answer. A company with 85/100 has earned the right to be taken at their word. A company with 35/100 should have their projections discounted significantly in any valuation model.

This educational content is part of The Q Factor's methodology documentation. The Execution Consistency Score is one component of our Q-Score framework and represents 30% of the total weighting. This is not financial advice. Past execution patterns may not predict future performance. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.